Algebraic extensions of power series rings

ALGEBRAIC INDEPENENCE OF CERTAIN FORMAL POWER SERIES (II)

We shall extend the results of [5] and prove that if f = Z o a x ? Z [[X]] is algebraic over Q (x), where a = 1, ƒ 1 and if ? , ? ,..., ? are p-adic integers, then 1 ? , ? ,..., ? are linkarly independent over Q if and only if (1+x) ,(1+x) ,…,(1+x) are algebraically independent over Q (x) if and only if f , f ,.., f are algebraically independent over Q (x)

ALGEBRAIC INDEPENDENCE OF CERTAIN FORMAL POWER SERIES (I)

We give a proof of the generalisation of Mendes-France and Van der Poorten's recent result over an arbitrary field of positive characteristic and then by extending a result of Carlitz, we shall introduce a class of algebraically independent series.

ON ANNIHILATOR PROPERTIES OF INVERSE SKEW POWER SERIES RINGS

Let $alpha$ be an automorphism of a ring $R$. The authors [On skewinverse Laurent-serieswise Armendariz rings, Comm. Algebra 40(1)(2012) 138-156] applied the concept of Armendariz rings to inverseskew Laurent series rings and introduced skew inverseLaurent-serieswise Armendariz rings. In this article, we study on aspecial type of these rings and introduce strongly Armendariz ringsof inverse ske...

Extensions of Nilpotent P.P. Rings

Anti-archimedean Rings and Power Series Rings

We define an integral domain D to be anti-Archimedean if ⋂∞ n=1 a nD 6= 0 for each 0 6= a ∈ D. For example, a valuation domain or SFT Prüfer domain is anti-Archimedean if and only if it has no height-one prime ideals. A number of constructions and stability results for anti-Archimedean domains are given. We show that D is anti-Archimedean ⇔ D[[X1, . . .